TY - JOUR AU - Kroszner, Randall S AU - Strahan, Philip E TI - Obstacles to Optimal Policy: The Interplay of Politics and Economics in Shaping Bank Supervision and Regulation Reforms JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 7582 PY - 2000 Y2 - March 2000 DO - 10.3386/w7582 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w7582 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w7582.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Randall S. Kroszner University of Chicago Booth School of Business 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 Tel: 773/702-8779 E-Mail: Randall.Kroszner@chicagobooth.edu Philip Strahan Carroll School of Management 324B Fulton Hall Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 Tel: 617/552-6430 E-Mail: philip.strahan@bc.edu M1 - published as Randall S. Kroszner, Philip E. Strahan. "Obstacles to Optimal Policy: The Interplay of Politics and Economics in Shaping Bank Supervision and Regulation Reforms," in Frederic S. Mishkin, editor, "Prudential Supervision: What Works and What Doesn't" University of Chicago Press (2001) AB - This paper provides a positive political economy analysis of the most important revision of the U.S. supervision and regulation system during the last two decades, the 1991 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). We analyze the impact of private interest groups as well as political-institutional factors on the voting patterns on amendments related to FDICIA and its final passage to assess the empirical importance of different types of obstacles to welfare-enhancing reforms. Rivalry of interests within the industry (large versus small banks) and between industries (banks versus insurance) as well as measures of legislator ideology and partisanship play important roles and, hence, should be taken into account in order to implement successful change. A divide and conquer' strategy with respect to the private interests appears to be effective in bringing about legislative reform. The concluding section draws tentative lessons from the political economy approaches about how to increase the likelihood of welfare-enhancing regulatory change. ER -