TY - JOUR AU - Barnow, Burt S AU - Smith, Jeffrey TI - Employment and Training Programs JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 21659 PY - 2015 Y2 - October 2015 DO - 10.3386/w21659 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w21659 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w21659.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Burt Barnow George Washington University 805 21st St NW, Room 601T Washington, DC 20052 E-Mail: barnow@gwu.edu Jeffrey A. Smith Department of Economics University of Wisconsin 1180 Observatory Drive Madison, WI 53706-1393 Tel: 608-262-3066 E-Mail: econjeff@ssc.wisc.edu M1 - published as Burt S. Barnow, Jeffrey Smith. "Employment and Training Programs," in Robert A. Moffitt, editor, "Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 2" University of Chicago Press (2016) M3 - presented at "Means-Tested Transfer Programs", December 5-6, 2014 AB - This chapter considers means-tested employment and training programs in the United States. We focus in particular on large, means-tested federal programs, including the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), its successor the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), that program’s recent replacement, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), the long-running Job Corps program, and the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program. The first part of the chapter provides details on program history, organization, expenditures, eligibility rules, services, and participant characteristics. In the second part of the chapter, we discuss the applied econometric methods typically used to evaluate these programs, which in the United States means primarily social experiments and methods such as matching that rely on an assumption of “selection on observed variables.” The third part of the chapter reviews the literature evaluating these programs, highlighting both methodological and substantive lessons learned as well as open questions. The fourth part of the chapter considers what lessons the evaluation literature provides on program operation, especially how to best allocate particular services to particular participants. The final section concludes with the big picture lessons from this literature and discussion of promising directions for future research. ER -