TY - JOUR AU - Davidson, Robert AU - Dey, Aiyesha AU - Smith, Abbie J TI - Executives' "Off-The-Job" Behavior, Corporate Culture, and Financial Reporting Risk JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 18001 PY - 2012 Y2 - April 2012 DO - 10.3386/w18001 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w18001 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w18001.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Robert Davidson Georgetown University McDonough School of Business Rafik Hariri Building 37th and O Streets, NW Washington, DC 20057 E-Mail: rhd22@georgetown.edu Aiyesha Dey University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management 321 - 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 E-Mail: deya@umn.edu Abbie Smith University of Chicago Booth School of Business 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 E-Mail: abbie.smith@chicagobooth.edu M1 - published as Robert Davidson, Aiyesha Dey, Abbie Smith. "Executives' "Off-The-Job" Behavior, Corporate Culture, and Financial Reporting Risk," in Luigi Zingales and James Poterba, organizers, "Causes and Consequences of Corporate Culture" Elsevier, Journal of Financial Economics 117(1) (2015) M3 - presented at "Causes and Consequences of Corporate Culture", December 8-9, 2011 AB - We examine how executives' behavior outside the workplace, as measured by their ownership of luxury goods (low "frugality") and prior legal infractions, is related to financial reporting risk. We predict and find that CEOs and CFOs with a legal record are more likely to perpetrate fraud. In contrast, we do not find a relation between executives' frugality and the propensity to perpetrate fraud. However, as predicted, we find that unfrugal CEOs oversee a relatively loose control environment characterized by relatively high probabilities of other insiders perpetrating fraud and unintentional material reporting errors. Further, cultural changes associated with an increase in fraud risk are more likely during unfrugal (vs. frugal) CEOs' reign, including the appointment of an unfrugal CFO, an increase in executives' equity-based incentives to misreport, and a decline in measures of board monitoring intensity. ER -