TY - JOUR AU - LaFrance, Jeffrey AU - Pope, Rulon AU - Tack, Jesse TI - Risk Response in Agriculture JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 16716 PY - 2011 Y2 - January 2011 DO - 10.3386/w16716 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w16716 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w16716.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Jeffrey LaFrance Department of Economics Room E953, Building 11 Monash University Clayton 3800 VIC Australia E-Mail: jtlafrance@wsu.edu Rulon Pope Department of Economics Brigham Young University Provo Utah 84602 E-Mail: rulon_pope@byu.edu Jesse B. Tack Department of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University 342 Waters Hall Manhattan, KS 66506 E-Mail: jtack@ksu.edu M1 - published as Jeffrey LaFrance, Rulon Pope, Jesse Tack. "Risk Response in Agriculture," in Joshua S. Graff Zivin and Jeffrey M. Perloff, editors, "The Intended and Unintended Effects of U.S. Agricultural and Biotechnology Policies" University of Chicago Press (2012) M3 - presented at "Agricultural Economics Conference", March 4-5, 2010 AB - Crop production is subject to supply shocks, and both expected and realized outputs as well as output prices are unknown when inputs are chosen. The process by which producers form expectations is difficult to model, especially when working with aggregate data. We present a necessary and sufficient condition on cost and technology to allow variable input demand equations to be specified as functions of input prices, quasi-fixed inputs, and total variable cost. These all are observable when inputs are committed to production, so that ex ante demands can be estimated with observable data. A flexible, exactly aggregable, and economically regular model of variable input demands is derived and applied to aggregate U.S. agricultural data for the period 1960-1999. We use the empirical results of this model to aid in the specification of a dynamic life-cycle model for agricultural producers facing output and output price risk, with investment in an off-farm, conditionally risk free asset, risky financial assets, savings, consumption, and agricultural production opportunities. This framework admits a coherent, structural, econometric model of input use, output production, savings, investment, and consumption for agricul-ture. We apply this model to U.S. data for the period 1960-1999. Ongoing work focuses on updating the data set to the 21st century and applying both components of the model at the state-level. ER -