TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kugler, Adriana
TI  - The Effect of Job Security Regulations on Labor Market Flexibility: Evidence from the Colombian Labor Market Reform
JF  - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series
VL  - No. 10215
PY  - 2004
Y2  - January 2004
DO  - 10.3386/w10215
UR  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w10215
L1  - http://www.nber.org/papers/w10215.pdf
N1  - Author contact info:
Adriana D. Kugler
Georgetown University
McCourt School of Public Policy
37th and O Streets NW, Suite 311
Washington, DC 20057
Tel: 202/687-5716
Fax: 202/687-5544
E-Mail: ak659@georgetown.edu
M1  - published as Adriana D. Kugler. "The Effect of Job Security Regulations on Labor Market Flexibility. Evidence from the Colombian Labor Market Reform," in James J. Heckman and Carmen Pagés, editors, "Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean" University of Chicago Press (2004)

AB  - Job security provisions are widely believed to reduce dismissals and hiring. In addition, in developing countries job security is believed to reduce compliance with labor regulations and to increase informal activity. Reductions in dismissal costs are, thus, often advocated as a way to increase labor market flexibility and to increase compliance with labor regulations. This paper analyzes the impact of a substantial reduction in dismissal costs introduced by the Colombian Labor Market Reform of 1990. A theoretical model illustrates the effect of dismissal costs when there is a noncompliant sector. The model shows the direct effect of a reduction in dismissal costs on increased turnover as well as the second order effects on wages and on the composition of the compliant and noncompliant sectors. Using microdata from the Colombian National Household Surveys, I exploit the temporal variability in dismissal costs together with the variability in coverage between formal and informal workers (who are not covered and were, thus, not directly affected by the reform). The differences-in-differences results indicate increased separations and accessions for formal workers relative to informal workers after the reform. Moreover, the increase in worker turnover was greatest among younger workers, more educated workers, and workers employed in larger firms who are most likely to have been affected by the reform. The estimates, together with the steady-state conditions of the model, suggest the reform contributed to 10% of the reduction in unemployment during the period of study.
ER  -