TY - JOUR AU - Dee, Philippa AU - Gali, Jyothi TI - The Trade and Investment Effects of Preferential Trading Arrangements JF - National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series VL - No. 10160 PY - 2003 Y2 - December 2003 DO - 10.3386/w10160 UR - http://www.nber.org/papers/w10160 L1 - http://www.nber.org/papers/w10160.pdf N1 - Author contact info: Philippa Dee Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government Crawford Building Canberra ACT 0200 Australia Tel: 61 2 6125 8598 Fax: 61 2 6125 0767 E-Mail: Philippa.Dee@anu.edu.au Jyothi Gali Productivity Commission POB 80 Belconnen ACT 2616, AUSTRALIA E-Mail: j.gali@acilallen.com.au M1 - published as Philippa Dee, Jyothi Gali. "The Trade and Investment Effects of Preferential Trading Arrangements," in Takatoshi Ito and Andrew K. Rose, editors, "International Trade in East Asia" University of Chicago Press (2005) AB - This study quantifies the impact of traditional and new age' provisions of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs) on merchandise trade and investment. It does so by estimating gravity models of bilateral trade and investment. It finds that recent and some past PTAs are not as benign as some contemporary empirical assessments have suggested. A careful consideration of the analytical issues including controlling comprehensively for other observable and unobservable factors, and testing explicitly for whether the trade and investment effects are significantly different after PTA formation than before accounts for less favourable finding in this study. It is also possible for PTAs to have adverse effects on investment flows. If investment responds in beachhead' fashion to the trade provisions of PTAs, the trade carried out from those beachheads could constitute traditional trade diversion. However, the paper finds little evidence of beachhead investment. Instead, it finds evidence of net investment creation in response to the new age', non-trade provisions of PTAs. Thus the finding on investment is more positive than for trade, but not without qualifications, since trade diversion is still possible from the new investment positions. ER -